Last updateWed, 18 Oct 2017 10am

Letters to the Editor

Small cars could pose big problems

Those cute, colorful little cars I see around town that look as if half their bodies are missing are becoming too affected by their gorgeous physiques and their environmental fame.

As their drivers zoom around Los Altos’ crowded streets, they ignore some of the rules of courteous and cautious driving. I hope they do not end up in an accident.

To the super-energetic drivers of these common little cars, we appreciate your concern for the environment and your willingness to conserve gas, but please refer to your driving manuals and keep our streets safe.

Just a gentle and small reminder: When approaching a crosswalk in downtown Los Altos, offer priority to pedestrians – children, parents and seniors who may be walking slowly while carrying a cup of their favorite java.

Lina Broydo

Los Altos Hills

Broadcast video for quick capture of perps

Reading about the recent bank robberies in our area makes us wonder why those banks’ security videos are not shown repeatedly on local TV stations. The Boston Marathon bombers were captured within a few days after their faces were displayed on TV.

Having regular, short newsflashes of local crimes would most likely lead to the quick capture of the perpetrators.

Susan and Les Besser

Los Altos

‘Powers that be’ don’t support LA nightlife

Regarding Alyssa Jacobson’s “Other Voices” column (“Downtown Los Altos could take a tip from Los Gatos,” May 22), the best I can say is, “Right on.”

I am a longtime Los Altos resident who, like my friends and neighbors, goes to nearby towns like Mountain View, Palo Alto, Los Gatos and San Jose for evening activities. These cities collect revenues from the money we spend at their shops, services, restaurants, movie theaters, etc.

Attempts to upgrade Los Altos and make it a more attractive destination are turned down by “the powers that be” – whoever they are.

I attended meetings where I suggested constructing a pedestrian shopping mall for parts of Main Street, sponsoring a city shuttle to take people from the city center to downtown and around local neighborhoods, keeping shops and restaurants open late, permitting a small movie theater and building a parking garage.

All suggestions are met with a negative “We like the town the way it is” or a challenging “Where will the money come from?”

I conclude that we will never have a thriving, vibrant city that is an evening destination. We will need to go elsewhere for activities after 6 p.m. Oddly enough, I do not recall ever voting on this issue.

On another topic, there are many residents of Los Altos and Los Altos Hills who are tired of reading about the whining, complaining and demanding from the Bullis Charter School crowd. Can we move on to something else, or could they locate their special school elsewhere and not expect the rest of us residents to pay for them?

Myra Orta

Los Altos

New Boy Scouts policy ‘tragic waste of talent’

I’ve read numerous articles about the Boy Scouts allowing gay youth to become members.

I’m delighted that at least that step has been taken. But I’m truly perplexed that gay adults are still excluded. Where do the gay Eagle Scouts go once they cannot become Boy Scout leaders?

Do they become Girl Scout or Camp Fire Girl leaders? Or do they disappear from the Scouting scene with their skills disregarded?

To me, this seems like a tragic waste of talent.

Barbara Emerich

Los Altos

Sewer rate hike requires voter approval

A 46 percent increase (in my case) for sewer service is outrageous.

Many of us in Los Altos are retired and living on fixed incomes. Those fixed incomes are not growing at all in these times of zero interest rates.

The city says it needs a 7 percent sewer increase. How can that possibly justify a 46 percent increase for those in my category and be considered fair? The city needs to revisit this proposal and come up with a more equitable solution.

This type of property fee assessment overreach is exactly what Proposition 13 was passed several decades ago to curtail. The consultants’ recommendation: “If less than a majority of the properties affected by the proposed sewer fee submit written protests to the fee, then the city may establish the fee” is not a legal method for approval of this increase.

Proposition 13 clearly requires that this type of fee must be passed by a two-thirds vote at a scheduled election.

If the city needs to push through these ridiculous increases, then let’s have the courage to get approvals the way the system requires – at the ballot box, not through the back door.

Bill Goodman

Los Altos

Submit a Letter to the Editor

The Town Crier welcomes letters to the editor on current events pertinent to Los Altos, Los Altos Hills and Mountain View. Write to us at 138 Main St., Los Altos 94022, Attn: Editor, or email editor Bruce Barton at bruceb@latc.com. Because editorial space is limited, please confine letters to no more than 200 words. Include a phone number for verification purposes. Anonymous letters will not be printed.

You can also have your say right here at losaltosonline.com – scroll to the bottom of any story to add a comment. 

Schools »

Read More

Sports »

Read More

People »

Read More

Special Sections »

Special Sections
Read More

Photos of Los Altos

Browse and buy photos