Business & Real Estate

Will no-cost trading improve your investment returns?

Charles Schwab & Co. revealed recently that it plans to eliminate online transaction fees for exchange-traded funds, stocks and options. Two days, later TD Ameritrade followed suit, causing brokerage stocks to suffer their worst weekly drop in well over a decade as investors digested the earnings losses brokerage firms are likely to experience.

Is this really a big deal, and which investors are most likely to benefit?

It is always beneficial to reduce the cost of making investments. And it’s fair to say every little bit helps. But in reality, transaction fees typically represent only a tiny fraction of the cost of investing, except for those with very small portfolios.

Let’s take an example. Jane Smith has an investment portfolio at Schwab comprising 20 exchange-traded funds and individual stocks worth $1 million, while John Jones has a $100,000 portfolio with 10 holdings. Let’s also assume that they each rebalance their portfolios twice a year. Before the change, Jane’s annual transaction fees would have totaled at most 20 x $4.95 x 2 = $198, while John’s would have been no more than 10 x $4.95 x 2 = $99.

Those fees would have reduced Jane’s overall annual portfolio return by $198/$1 million, or less than 0.02%, an amount that is virtually immaterial. In John’s case, the impact would have been $99/$100,000, or 0.1% – a bigger hit than Jane’s losses, to be sure, but still pretty small. It is only with portfolios worth less than $10,000 that transaction costs can actually begin to make a difference in returns.

Minor savings

One fact not highlighted by the media is that mutual fund transaction fees have not been eliminated. And across the discount brokerage firm world, they can run anywhere from zero to as much as $75. Coupled with the fact that the majority of individual investors as well as those working with advisers hold more mutual funds than exchange-traded funds, the benefit from this highly publicized cost-saving action by Schwab is likely to be that much smaller for most investors.

Consider also that the annual expense of owning a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund is likely to dwarf any transaction fees associated with trading them. Just a single mutual fund with an annual expense ratio of 0.50% and with a balance of $10,000 in your portfolio will cost you $500 each year, significantly more than even the maximum $75 it would cost to buy or sell it.

One class of investor that Schwab’s move would definitely help is the so-called day trader. And that’s unfortunate, because I think Schwab would be doing them a disservice by encouraging them. There is no evidence that day trading, which relies on market timing and/or individual stock picking, has ever been a consistently successful strategy. Quite the contrary. Most studies reveal that the more people trade, the lower their returns. And not so much because of the transaction costs (which are certainly a factor), but rather because of the unpredictability of future price movements, especially in the short term. Day-trader successes and failures are largely a matter of luck.

Brokerage firm stock prices are likely to be quite volatile over the next several weeks as the market sorts out the winners and losers of this new round of cost cutting. While I’m glad that some investment costs are coming down, don’t expect to be able to celebrate with anything more out of your savings than perhaps one nice dinner.

Los Altos resident Artie Green is a Certified Financial Planner and principal at Cognizant Wealth Advisors. For more information, email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or visit

Schools »

Read More

Sports »

Read More

People »

Read More

Special Sections »

Special Sections
Read More

Photos of Los Altos

Browse and buy photos