Measure N: Town Crier has no recommendation: Editorial

We love our Los Altos School District schools. They’re a vital part of our thriving community – not because their excellence generates optimal property values, but because they give our children a great public education. We salute Superintendent Jeff Baier and the district’s board of trustees on continuing the district’s success despite years of contentious Bullis Charter School negotiations.

So it pains us to say that we can’t quite give an enthusiastic “Yes!” to Measure N. We know that the district needs facilities improvements, just as we know that enrollment growth is real. But as currently proposed, the initiative promises everything and guarantees nothing. It’s the equivalent of handing over a $150 million blank check with faith that the district will figure it out.


Vote 'no' on Measure N: Other Voices

It’s best to vote “no” on the Measure N school bond in November. Strangely, there is a real danger that the Los Altos School District is underestimating its own growth needs. The district’s plans show a strong bias toward improvements on existing schools that do not provide adequately for the projected growth. An extra year or two will provide clarity on several important issues that are as yet indeterminate. These include:

• The state has plans outstanding to require every school district to offer not just one but two years of kindergarten to every student.


Jump: Haugh About That?

Perched at the edge of the world, I stood immobile as the hot afternoon wind licked my 10-year-old back. Looking out over the vastness ahead, it was clear: There was nowhere to go but down.


Letters to the Editor

School lunches leave kids hungry

I could not read the guest opinion about the new school hot-lunch program without commenting (“School lunch: Opportunity to improve health, academics,” Sept. 17).

As one of the many PTA volunteers who dedicate countless hours to running the hot-lunch program, I would like to offer another perspective of the menu changes instituted this year.


Letters to the Editor

MVLA superintendent refutes Latino statistic

The Mountain View Los Altos Union High School District is proud of the accomplishments of its Latino students and the support that our staff provides them.

In the Oct. 1 Town Crier, MVLA Board of Trustees candidate Doug Moore claimed that there have been no Latino students admitted to Stanford University since 2006.


Mordo, Prochnow for Los Altos council: Editorial

For a city council to be effective, it must have councilmembers with useful expertise, community experience and an approach that emphasizes productivity and teamwork over political grandstanding.

The Los Altos City Council, as currently constituted, lacks the overall leadership and vision to effectively address long-standing issues like the downtown parking problem and renovating the civic center. This is not to say that there aren’t good councilmembers already on board – we just need more of them.


Torok, Walter, Dave for MVLA board: Editorial

There’s really nothing major you can criticize about the Mountain View Los Altos Union High School District. It offers a diverse array of effective programs for all types of students. Its instructors, with few exceptions, are outstanding.

However, there’s always room for improvement. The current board of trustees, some observers claim, is passive and unanimously approves whatever Superintendent Barry Groves puts in front of them. Board critics say trustees rarely introduce their own items for consideration, rarely engage in lengthy discussion about items and ask few questions.


Schools »

Read More

Sports »

Read More

People »

Read More

Special Sections »

Special Sections
Read More

Photos of Los Altos

Browse and buy photos