Letters to the Editor
Written by Los Altos Town Crier   
Wednesday, 30 January 2013

Forget ‘traffic-calming,’ enforce speed laws

A little honesty about “traffic calming” might be useful.

In the Jan. 16 Town Crier, an article described wrestling over the idea of making “a $2 million investment (for Fremont roundabouts) to reduce the speed” (“Residents resoundingly reject Fremont roundabout.”) Why would Los Altos spend $2 million to reduce the average speed on Fremont Avenue rather than just changing a few signs and then enforcing the speed limit?

The answer: Because the existing limit is unenforceable. Why? Because it violates California state law. The existing speed limit already constitutes a speed trap, according to state law and traffic surveys, and citations don’t stand up in court.

So rather than either comply with California state law or work through the legislature to try and change it, “traffic calmers” want to spend millions of dollars of Los Altos tax money to erect obstacles to traffic flow, creating a de facto speed limit “below the radar” (pun intended).

A democratic process exists for creating, enforcing and modifying laws. Let’s use it.

William Brown

Los Altos

Don’t hold education hostage

My three children have been educated in the Los Altos School District and benefited tremendously. The district has done an outstanding job.

I have also observed the district address the special needs of other students and also the needs of those who are academically challenged. Clearly the district has not taken a “one size fits all” approach to education.

So what does Bullis Charter School offer that the district doesn’t, and at what cost?

If charter school parents want the “extras,” they should bear the cost, because the district has done extraordinarily well for the community.

The long-term solution is to dissolve Bullis Charter School. If the district does not provide what Bullis Charter School parents demand, these parents can (a) enroll their child in the appropriate private school, (b) school their children at home and/or (c) supplement the district’s education after school hours on their own dime.

Public education should not be held hostage to those who demand that their every wants be satisfied. Bullis Charter School parents should stop playing the entitlement game and allow the district to put its resources to work for everybody.

David S. Lee

Los Altos

Resident appreciates Acosta column on guns

I wholeheartedly agree with Grace Acosta’s view that more guns lead to more killing (“It’s the guns, stupid,” Jan. 23).

A study done in 2007 by Small Arms Survey, an independent Swiss organization, supports her point: For every 100 residents, the United States had 89 firearms, compared with an average of 15.1 in the 10 developed countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, England and Wales, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands and Spain). The gun murder rate in 100,000 people was 3.0 in the U.S. and an average of 0.25 in the above-listed nations. These statistics are nearly six years old, and the number of firearms in our country has most likely increased during that period.

No doubt that there are other causes beside guns for the 12-times-higher rate of killings in the U.S., but the comparison is still deplorable. The simplest explanation might still be that having a firearm makes it too easy to kill. After all, a single person can spread death in a matter of seconds to a large number of people – without even being close to them.

I grew up in Hungary and participated in the 1956 Revolution. We learned the hard way that guns and Molotov cocktails were no match for Soviet tanks and howitzers. As Acosta points out, in a democratic country like the U.S., there are more sensible alternatives than citizens arming themselves.

Les Besser

Los Altos

 3 Comments
1Comment
at Monday, 04 February 2013 10:04by Concerned Citizen
David S. Lee - I hope you are not giving advice about improving education in our community. How about a lesson on ethics and integrity instead? 
 
http://www.losaltosonline.co m/index.php?option=com_content&task=view &id=23696&Itemid=59
2Comment
at Thursday, 07 February 2013 15:04by Bob Jones
Kudos to William Brown's letter to the editor (Jan. 30, 2013)  
"Forget about traffic calming, enforce speed laws." 
He hit the nail on the head. All this so-called traffic calming is a huge waste 
of money that could be redirected into more useful areas, such as adding 
two more stop signs at the intersection of Main and 2nd streets, making it a 
safer four way stop. If there is a problem with speeding on Fremont Ave., 
then what is the accident rate there? How does the accident rate  
compare to the norm? 
When I lived in Palo Alto years ago I grimaced often at the folly of the  
so called traffic engineering department's "trial and error" type of fiascos. Lots of wasted city funds went down the drain on silly 
anti-auto endeavors.  
Lets not let Los Altos go down that same path.
3Comment
at Thursday, 07 February 2013 15:54by Resident off of Fremont
The intersection of Fremont and Fallen Leaf (where the roundabout was suggested) has more than average accidents that continually hit a residents wall causing damage now for the third time since they lived there. 
 
Anyone that wants to form an opinion or drop of a nugget of wisdom should be forced to make that turn from Fallen Leaf towards Highway 85 at 8:00 am or 5:30pm daily. Plus make sure you have your elderly parents make that turn and your 17 year old child and then you can see what the issue is. 
 
I don't care that Sunnyvale has a bunch of lights on Fremont - that's Sunnyvale. We need a light there. It is the only safe option in my opinion. Throw one at Covington and Miramonte too while you're at it. :)

Post Comment

Email (will not be published)
Name
Title
Comment
 remaining characters
Captcha Image Regenerate code when it's unreadable
We reserve the right to use comments submitted on our site in whole or in part. We will not publish comments that contain inappropriate content, advertising or website links to inappropriate content.